Articulating Vs. Static Antibiotic Impregnated Spacers in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Sepsis. A Systematic Review
Publication Date
2014
Journal Title
J Arthroplasty
Abstract
Periprosthetic infection after total knee arthroplasty is a devastating complication, and two-stage exchange is the standard of care in North America. Articulating and static spacers have been developed to treat these infections but controversy exists over which method is superior. We performed a systematic review using MEDLINE and other literature search engines identifying 47 articles meeting inclusion criteria producing 2011 spacers for comparison. Articulating spacers had increased range of motion 100.1 degrees vs. 82.9 degrees (P < 0.003), lower re-infection rate 7.5% (P < 0.0031), facilitated re-implantation (P < 0.0011), and developed less bone loss (P < .0001) than did static spacers. This study answers several clinically relevant questions and provides useful information in guiding clinical decision making in treating periprosthetic infection. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Volume Number
29
Issue Number
3
Pages
558-563
Document Type
Article
Status
Faculty
Facility
School of Medicine
Primary Department
Orthopedic Surgery
PMID
DOI
10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.013